Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts

Thursday, February 14, 2008

What I read (4): Dating is Dead

Dating is Dead

Who she is: Belle lives in NoVA and I met her late last year at a blogger happy hour. I'd started reading her blog and particularly wanted to meet her. She's in her 20's, grew up in the Deep South and has been in the DC area for about a year. She's good natured, a good sport and a good person.

Why I read: Belle is a great writer with a good ear for dialog. The details of her dating stories are priceless. She is a tolerant person—to a fault and to many other people's faults—but that's why she's so sympathetic. Unfortunately, her blogging has fallen off in recent months. While I wish she would post more often, I hope she's at least doing her writing somewhere else.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

What I read (3): Bathroom Reading

Bathroom Reading

Who he is: he lives near DC and I met him at a blogger happy hour--he is a rowing coach! We had plenty of rowing stuff to talk about, which was fun. Other than that, he is recently re-employed, has a bunch of housemates, and likes goofy movies.

Why I read: Funny and sometimes personal stories. The movie reviews/reflections are interesting. I like it when men share personal stories, it's rare. This blog mixes up the personal stuff with cultural, topical stories. It's been almost a month since his last post--is work getting in the way of blogging, perhaps? That is no excuse! Let's argue some more about what the best teen romantic comedies are, ok?

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

What I read (2): Articulatory Loop

Articulatory Loop - Read, Repeat, Remember

Who he is: Michael is a public health student in Atlanta but he used to live in DC. I met him at the blogger meet up and he's a great guy. Other than studying a whole lot and letting us in on a few of his insights, I don't know what else he's up to these days. He also writes at DCFUD.

Why I read: I often learn something from Michael. His entries are short and informative. I enjoy seeing the trends of epidemiological and public health research and even though the links are technical, Michael does a great job of translating for us dilettantes. My only complaints? 1) He should post more often and 2) I'd like the full feed to be available in RSS. Other than that, keep up the good work!

Monday, February 11, 2008

What I read (1): Arjewtino

Arjewtino

Who he is: an early-thirties guy who is (believe it or not) a Jew from Argentina. After leaving Argentina as a youngster, he spent the rest of his youth in L.A., which has left its mark (Dodger's fan). He lives with his girlfriend, "The Princess," who strikes me as a very good sport. Arjew, as we like to call him, works hard as a government contractor type. He was also super nice to me after my last great break up. Break up? What break up?

Why I read: Smart, funny stories. He’s good writer and posts lots of pictures. The stories are generally personal with a heavy does of sports and humor. He could probably write a book—no, he should definitely write a book—but he’d need to pick a topic first. Or maybe a book of essays? It’ll be good, whatever he decides.

Monday, January 07, 2008

Jane Eyre

I have a weakness for Jane Eyre. It is absolutely my favorite story of all time. While I have stock answer for favorite movie (Born Yesterday) and favorite book (Jane Eyre), I somewhat doubt my favorite movie answer. After last night, though, I don't doubt my favorite book answer.

Last night, I stayed up to 1am watching a two-part Masterpiece Theater Version of Jane Eyre. It was good, not great, but I found myself incapable of turning off the tv or taping the end to watch later. I had to watch, that night, to get to the sweet ending.

This version tried to introduce "science" in the form of a naturalist houseguest and it didn't quite work for me but I admired the effort. There was also rather more canoodling between Jane and Mr. R than was plausible. No sex, but a couple of "sexy" scenes and I was like, "Oh, no, that is NOT Jane." But, overall, it told all parts of the story, including some of the early years which are often skipped entirely in film versions. Skipping them, I think, is a way of minimizing the importance of what happens to us in childhood. While this version emphasizes the "interesting" parts of the novel, it does give full coverage, which is great and challenging.

What I love about the novel isn't the plot as much as it's the main character. I love Jane. She knows herself so well and that is why I admire her.

I might not make the same choices as she made. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't (when I first read the book, I was sure I would). The ardent Christianity bothered me on my second read and I don't like it as a motivator. What I do like is that Jane will do as she sees fit, no matter what anyone else tells her. She also carves out her own version of Christianity to follow—she is not a puritan and can't completely turn the other cheek, but certain forms of immorality are unacceptable.

One great scene in the movie, which I'm not sure was in the book, Jane is telling someone [St. John] why she loves Mr. Rochester, even though he is a "bad man." She says, "I always knew myself but he was the first person who recognized me. And loved me because of it."

Exactly! We may be perfectly self-sufficient and independent and able to live without love (if necessary) but there is nothing sweeter in this life than being known and loved for who we are.

Segue to Mom….

And, that, I think, is why things are so hard and so easy with my mother. I have always known who I am. While I may muck around and make bad decisions, my basic sense of personhood and self-worth remains undisturbed. I only blame myself for the things that are my fault. I'll go out of my way to discover them but I won't take responsibility for things I can't control.

While the stuff with Mom is disheartening, because I assume that she does recognize me and love me for who I am, not just because I'm her daughter. I also know that I am who I am, and I am worthwhile, even if she can't always see it. What she thinks of me doesn't change me. It might make me feel bad, but that's all. It's not true just because she thinks it.

And, of course, she doesn't actually think it. She feels bad and dissatisfied about our relationship. She is torn between feeling underappreciated and worrying that she didn't do enough for me. But those feelings are coming from her and there is precious little I can do to change them.

We finally talked about all the issues on Saturday and, while frustrating at times, it was a good conversation. I'm glad that Mom said what she needed to say. What I needed to say was that I wasn't sure that anything I do will satisfy her. She agreed—she wasn't sure what it would take either!

The good news is that things are resolved, for now. And I am resolved that, in the future, I will remain calm and patient and not be offended or angry. I will listen and remember that I know who I am and I can handle it.

Plus, I'm going to reread Jane Eyre. It's about time.

Grateful for: Jane Eyre.

Sunday, April 08, 2007

Miss Jane

I've been poking around on the free dating site for the last couple of weeks. Given that I'm engaged in a dead-end relationship, the least I can do is explore the virtual dating world. I expect nothing to come from it, but it is a tangible reminder that I have options. Since when did the virtual become tangible and real life become ethereal? Only I could end up in this kind of muddle.

Anyway. The other day, a guy who has this statement in his profile, "Women tell me I resemble Omar Sharif in 'Dr. Zhivago,'" (he doesn't) sent me an email.

The email read, "Can I be your Mr. Rochester? We're closer in age than he was to Jane."

My answer to the question, "what is your favorite book?" is Jane Eyre. While I do love Jane Eyre, it's just my canned response. I couldn't begin to figure out what my favorite book it. I love the Claudine series by Collette. I love most of Dashiell Hammett's novels (I didn't love The Dain Curse or Red Harvest, but at least one of those made a fine Samurai picture) and all of his short stories. I've read everything I could get my hands on by F. Scott Fitzgerald, including a screenplay and juvenilia. I've read five (that's all, I believe) of Jean Rhys's novels (ironically (?) The Wide Sargasso Sea is my least favorite). I've read every word written by each Brontë sister and all of Jane Austen. A lot of Dostoevsky's--I think The Brothers Karamazov is one of the best books ever written. I've also read War and Peace (I did skim the essay bits), Moby Dick and Daniel Deronda (mostly impressive for its length). And Middlemarch. Don't forget my early love of Henry James. I've read most of his early shorter works and the lengthy, but rewarding, Portrait of a Lady. I've read most of the post-western output of Elmore Leonard and most of John D. MacDonald, including the pre-Travis McGee pulp. I can't possibly pick a favorite. However, I've probably re-read Jane Eyre more than any book except The Thin Man. I might even be due to read it again soon.

But you know what my first reaction to the message was? "Do you think I'm plain or what?"

Vanity triumphs!

Grateful for: all those great books.